By Scott Riddle Posted in Eleventh Circuit CasesGraupner v. Nuvell Credit Corp. (In re Graupner), No. 07-13657 (11th Cir. August 6, 2008) (click here for opinion). In a case of first impression at the Circuit level, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals examined the "hanging paragraph" that comes after 11 U.S.C. §1325(a)(9). The basic facts of this case are as follows: Debtor purchased a… Continue Reading
By Posted in Middle District CasesJason Braswell of Morgan & Morgan in Athens, Georgia passed along is case of In re Carter , Case No. 3:07-CV-50, Ch. 13 Case No. 06-30846 (M.D. Ga.) (click here for .pdf), wherein Judge Land affirmed the Bankruptcy Court’s ruling that surrender of "910 vehicles" constitutes full satisfaction of the claim. This issue has been discussed… Continue Reading
By Posted in Miscellaneous CasesOn July 5, 2007, the Seventh Circuit held that the "hanging paragraph" of 11 U.S.C. §1325 meant that the secured creditor may assert a deficiency claim after the surrender and liquidation of a "910 vehicle." This is generally known as the minority position (and the one followed in the ND Ga). See this post for… Continue Reading
By Scott Riddle Posted in Miscellaneous CasesOn July 5, 2007, the Seventh Circuit held that the "hanging paragraph" of 11 U.S.C. §1325 meant that the secured creditor may assert a deficiency claim after the surrender and liquidation of a "910 vehicle." This is generally known as the minority position (and the one followed in the ND Ga). See this post for… Continue Reading
By Posted in Miscellaneous CasesIn a case that was a direct appeal to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §158(d)(2)(A), the Court held that the "hanging paragraph" of 11 U.S.C. §1325 left lenders with a deficiency claim after surrender of the "910 vehicle." The Court rejects the majority (?) view that Congress "accidentally gave debtors… Continue Reading
By Scott Riddle Posted in Miscellaneous CasesIn a case that was a direct appeal to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §158(d)(2)(A), the Court held that the "hanging paragraph" of 11 U.S.C. §1325 left lenders with a deficiency claim after surrender of the "910 vehicle." The Court rejects the majority (?) view that Congress "accidentally gave debtors… Continue Reading